A Stock Market Conundrum

First Trust Monday Morning Outlook

Brian S. Wesbury - Chief Economist

Robert Stein, CFA - Dep. Chief Economist

January 29, 2024

The economy is still growing. Real GDP rose at a solid 3.3% annual rate in the fourth quarter, and consumer spending was strong in December meaning the first quarter is off to a good start. New home sales came in above expectations and initial jobless claims remain low, although orders for durable goods came in low due to weak demand for aircraft.

All eyes are now on Friday’s jobs report, which we expect to show a gain of about 170,000 while the unemployment rate holds steady. But the strength in employment seems fragile. If we exclude job gains in government, health & education (which are largely funded by government), and leisure & hospitality (still recovering from lockdowns), job growth looks exceptionally weak. In the last seven months of 2023, payrolls excluding those categories rose only 3,000 per month, the kind of weakness we might expect before a recession. In other words, much of recent growth is fueled by government deficits.

Meanwhile the stock market continues to rally, with the S&P 500 closing at a new record high last Thursday. That’s great, but we aren’t exactly sure what the market sees.

If the economy remains healthy and keeps growing, it’s very hard to imagine the Federal Reserve cutting short-term interest rates by the 125-150 basis points the markets appear to expect. In turn, less rate cutting than the market expects should be a headwind for equities in 2024.

What would get the Fed to cut rates by 125-150 bps? Either a sharp drop in inflation or a decline in economic growth. While lower inflation is good, can a sharp drop happen without a weak economy? Either way, we don’t think the stock market would like that outcome because they would likely signal lower corporate profits.

This is all consistent with our Capitalized Profits Model, which still says stocks are overvalued. That model uses economy-wide profits from the GDP accounts (excluding profits or losses by the Fed) and discounts them by the 10-year Treasury yield. Using the level of profits in the third quarter (we won’t get Q4 numbers for profits until the end of March) and a 10-year yield of 4% (which was its yield before rate cut expectations started to evaporate), suggests the S&P 500 would be fairly valued at about 3,900, well below recent highs.

What would it take to suggest that recent stock prices are appropriate? A 10-year yield of 3.2% would do it. So would a 30% increase in profits. But a 3.2% yield would probably be accompanied by lower profits and a 30% surge in profits would likely be accompanied by a much higher 10-year yield, so fair value is even further away than it seems.

The only way out of this conundrum is if Artificial Intelligence and other new and rapidly advancing technologies provide a miraculous boost to productivity. This could keep growth strong, or even accelerate it, while bringing inflation down. In other words, profits up and interest rates down.

While this could happen, it would take a miracle. And while expecting miracles worked for San Francisco fans, we still think investors should remain cautious. The monetary and fiscal stimulus that made COVID lockdowns seem like a bump in the economic road are wearing off.

The attached information was developed by First Trust, an independent third party. The opinions are of the listed authors at First Trust Advisors L.P, and are independent from and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James.  All investments are subject to risk. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions, or forecasts provided in the attached article will prove to be correct. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Forward looking data is subject to change at any time and there is no assurance that projections will be realized. Any information provided is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market.

Slower Growth in Q4, But No Recession

First Trust Monday Morning Outlook

Brian S. Wesbury - Chief Economist

Robert Stein, CFA - Dep. Chief Economist

January 22, 2024

The economy slowed substantially in the last quarter of 2023 from the rapid pace of the third quarter, but, as we explain below, still expanded at a moderate rate. Some will take this week’s Real GDP report to confirm their prior view the recession is simply not in the cards for the US economy, but we still think a recession is more likely than not.

Why do we still think a recession is coming? Because monetary policy is tight whether you like to use the yield curve, the “real” (inflation-adjusted) federal funds rate, or the M2 measure of money to assess the stance of policy from the Federal Reserve.

Why hasn’t a recession happened yet? Because monetary policy works with long and variable lags and a surge in the budget deficit in 2023 temporarily postponed the economic day of reckoning. We are right now living through a reckless Keynesian experiment with massive deficit spending relative to low unemployment, with the government having devised programs to temporarily boost GDP in the short run. But this government spending isn’t lifting long-term growth; it’s stealing from future growth.

In the meantime, higher short-term interest rates mean businesses have the ability to lock in healthy nominal returns on cash with minimal risk. In turn, this should lead to a reduction in risk-taking and business investment.

In the meantime, we estimate that Real GDP expanded at a moderate 2.1% annual rate in the fourth quarter, mostly accounted for by an increase in consumer spending.

Consumption: “Real” (inflation-adjusted) retail sales outside the auto sector rose at a modest 1.3% annual rate in Q4 while auto sales declined at a 3.6% rate. However, it looks like real services, which makes up most of consumer spending, should be up at a moderate 2.4% pace. Putting it all together, we estimate that real consumer spending on goods and services, combined, increased at a 2.2% rate, adding 1.5 points to the real GDP growth rate (2.2 times the consumption share of GDP, which is 68%, equals 1.5).

Business Investment: We estimate a 1.8% growth rate for business investment, with gains in intellectual property leading the way, while commercial construction declined. A 1.8% growth rate would add 0.2 points to real GDP growth. (1.8 times the 13% business investment share of GDP equals 0.2).

Home Building: Residential construction is showing some resilience in spite of some lingering pain from higher mortgage rates. Home building looks like it grew at a 2.6% rate, which would add 0.1 points to real GDP growth. (2.6 times the 4% residential construction share of GDP equals 0.1).

Government: Only direct government purchases of goods and services (not transfer payments) count when calculating GDP. We estimate these purchases – which represent a 17% share of GDP – were up at a 1.7% rate in Q4, which would add 0.3 points to the GDP growth rate (1.7 times the 17% government purchase share of GDP equals 0.3).

Trade: Looks like the trade deficit shrank in Q4, as both exports and imports declined but imports declined faster. In government accounting, a drop in the trade deficit means faster growth, even if exports and imports both declined. We’re projecting net exports will add 0.3 points to real GDP growth.

Inventories: Inventory accumulation looks like it slowed down in Q4, meaning inventories generally went up, but at a slower pace than in Q3. That translates into what we estimate will be a 0.3 point drag on the growth rate of real GDP. When a recession hits, we expect inventory declines to play a significant role in the drop in GDP.

Add it all up, and we get a 2.1% annual real GDP growth rate for the fourth quarter. If we are right about a recession, this number is likely to go to zero or below sometime in first half of 2024.

The attached information was developed by First Trust, an independent third party. The opinions are of the listed authors at First Trust Advisors L.P, and are independent from and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James.  All investments are subject to risk. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions, or forecasts provided in the attached article will prove to be correct. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Forward looking data is subject to change at any time and there is no assurance that projections will be realized. Any information provided is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected.

Budgets And Governing

First Trust Monday Morning Outlook

Brian S. Wesbury - Chief Economist

Robert Stein, CFA - Dep. Chief Economist

January 16, 2024

The leaders of the House and Senate have come up with a new budget deal, and many people aren’t happy. It still needs passing by January 19th, or else the government, evidently, may shutdown. We doubt that this will happen, but the fight over government spending seems to drag on year after year after year.

It’s not hard to understand why. Non-defense spending by the federal government (including entitlements like Social Security) has climbed dramatically.

• 10% of GDP in the 1960s

• 14.8% of GDP in 2001

• 15.2% of GDP in 2007

• 17.8% of GDP in 2019

• And now, projected at roughly 22% of GDP over the next 5 years, after peaking at 27.7% in 2020

In other words, non-defense spending now consumes more than twice as much GDP every year as it did 60 years ago. It’s share of GDP is up 45% from just before the Great Recession, and it’s up 24% from the year before COVID. Government continues to take more and more of what the private sector produces, and it is heading for annual deficits of about $2 trillion.

The Great Recession and COVID were one off-events. Yet somehow, government spending never returned to pre-crisis levels following either. And because politicians have not been punished at the ballots for such unconstrained spending – or the resulting deficits – they have had little incentive to alter course.

This is why budget battles have turned consistently ugly in recent years. Repeated threats to not raise the debt ceiling or shut down the government because a budget can’t be agreed on have become commonplace. An ever- changing mix of politicians who want to see spending controlled face heavy pressure from every direction that they must go along to get along. But they still fight. And fight they should.

Total debt has ballooned at the same time the Fed lifted artificially low interest rates to fight the inflation that poor policies created, causing net interest expenses to skyrocket. In 2020, the net interest expense was $332.6 billion. In the past twelve months, it has totaled $730.4 billion. The Congressional Budget Office expects net interest expenses to rise to above $1 trillion per year after 2028. Lunacy.

While many think all the US has to do is raise tax rates, history suggests eliminating deficits this way is virtually impossible. The last period the budget was balanced was between 1998 and 2001. During those years, tax receipts averaged an all-time record of 19.4% of GDP, while total spending averaged just 18%.

This was the tail end of a miraculous period in modern US history. Starting with Ronald Reagan, and continuing through Bill Clinton, government spending fell as a share of GDP. The less government spends, the more there is left for private sector growth. Economic growth boomed, and that growth boosted tax receipts.

When spending gets too high, economic growth slows, as do tax receipts. Last year, the CBO’s budget forecast overestimated tax receipts by 11%, and underestimated spending by 9%. The bigger government gets, the more likely this happens year after year.

Back in the 1980s and 1990s, when the US was cutting spending, real GDP grew an average of 3.2% per year. In the past two years, in spite of historically large Keynesian deficits, real GDP has averaged just 1.7%.

We understand that the make-up of Congress creates difficulties for those who want to cut spending. But calling them names and accusing them of not being able to govern perpetuates the problem. Out of control spending, and huge deficits as far as the eye can see, are the real failure in governance.

The attached information was developed by First Trust, an independent third party. The opinions are of the listed authors at First Trust Advisors L.P, and are independent from and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James.  All investments are subject to risk. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions, or forecasts provided in the attached article will prove to be correct. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Forward looking data is subject to change at any time and there is no assurance that projections will be realized. Any information provided is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected.

2024 Economic Outlook: Prepare for Landing

Raymond James

Economy & Policy

January 08, 2024

Chief Economist Eugenio Alemán and Economist Giampiero Fuentes examine the factors which will contribute to the U.S. economy's path forward in 2024.

To read the full article, see the Investment Strategy Quarterly publication linked below.

Key Takeaways:

• Inflationary pressures continued to push lower during the third and fourth quarter of last year with no signs that structural changes would prevent the Federal Reserve (Fed) from achieving its 2% inflation target.

• Markets have begun to believe that the Fed will cut rates several times in 2024, starting in the first quarter. We disagree – we believe that the Fed is more concerned about a potential reacceleration of inflation and it will be very careful in moving rates lower.

• The more than 500 basis points (bps) in fed funds rate hikes has negatively impacted both consumers and the government.

Just as pilots assess conditions before landing, Fed Chair Jerome Powell analyzes the U.S. economy as we enter the final leg of the post-COVID-19 journey. Meanwhile, as investors fasten their seatbelts and hope for a soft landing, we economists fine tune our forecasts for the year. The economy is expected to fluctuate as we expect a wide range of headwinds and tailwinds to challenge the U.S. consumer, but despite some turbulence, we continue to believe that there will be a safe landing.

Inflation: We have started our descent

After more than a year when some analysts argued that structural changes were probably going to keep inflation higher than during the pre-COVID period while preventing the Fed from achieving its inflationary target, inflationary pressures continued to push lower during the third and fourth quarter of last year with no signs that structural changes would be able to prevent the Fed from achieving the 2% inflation target.

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) continued its disinflationary path toward the end of 2023, bringing significant optimism to investors. Hopes of a soft landing and expectations of inflation hitting the 2% target faster than many had expected have pushed markets to believe that the Fed will cut rates several times in 2024, starting in the first quarter. We disagree with the markets because we believe that the Fed is more concerned about a potential reacceleration of inflation, especially if the U.S. economy can avoid a recession and it will be very careful in moving rates lower.

If we assume the economy continues to be strong and experiences a soft landing, what would be the rationale for lower rates if the economy can handle a 5.5% federal funds rate and still grow unabated? In this case, we believe the Fed would be more mindful to preserve the opportunity to ease monetary policy if a future recession requires it. For example, along with quantitative easing, the reason the Fed was able to ease monetary policy in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic was because it raised the fed funds rate from 0-0.25% in 2015 to 2.25-2.50% in 2019. On the other hand, if rates were already lower in 2020, the Fed would have had less ‘cushion’ to work with.

Even if the economy goes into a mild recession as we are still expecting, the Fed is going to be reluctant to move interest rates much lower fearing that lower interest rates could push inflation higher again.

National debt: Sustained crosswinds

The impact of interest rate increases, amounting to more than 500 basis points since the hiking cycle began, has adversely affected both consumers and the government. The government's annual interest expenditure on the public debt is projected to surpass $1 trillion in 2024, marking the highest figure on record. However, the challenge lies not in the ability of the U.S. to meet its debt obligations; rather, the biggest issue with the U.S. debt is that the political system needs to agree on an already stretched budget to include these interest payments, as well as a long-term solution to the debt problem.

Today, about two-thirds of government expenditures are earmarked for non-discretionary, or mandatory, programs. That is, unless there are changes to current laws, we need to keep paying those expenditures. This is something much like ‘fixed costs’ in terms of business parlance: there are no degrees of freedom to change those expenditures in the short-to-medium run unless there is agreement between the parties in Congress. The remaining one-third of government expenditures are discretionary, which the U.S. government could potentially adjust to allow for payment of higher interest payments on the debt, but these outlays also require political agreement to decide on a solution.

Labor market: Turbulence ahead

The U.S. labor market added over 2.5 million jobs in 2023, but nonfarm payrolls started to slow during the last few months of the year. Job openings have been on a downward trend since peaking in 2022 and we expect this trend to continue in the first quarter of 2024. As the economy continues to slow, we expect the labor market to contract slightly starting in the second quarter of this year. This should push the unemployment rate higher, to ~4.8% in the third quarter of 2024, but we expect the labor market to start to recover before the year ends.

The bottom line: Cleared for landing

Stable and lower inflation, lower job growth and a weaker consumer are going to slow economic growth from the strong expansion experienced in 2023 to ~1.0% in 2024. While we continue to expect a very mild recession that lasts for two quarters, we want to emphasize that the overall growth for the year will remain positive. With current available resources, the U.S. is estimated to be able to grow sustainably at ~1.9% without triggering higher prices. Therefore, our GDP forecast for the U.S. economy, if it materializes, should not only be welcomed by investors but also by the Fed as inflation will be less likely to reaccelerate.

The economic outlook for 2024 should not be the year of ‘recession’ but rather a year of ‘sustained disinflation with weak economic growth.’ In fact, according to our forecast, the upcoming recession would not only be very mild, with fewer job losses and declines in fixed investments, but also shorter in duration than the average recession. While we expect consumer spending to weaken, we expect government and nonresidential fixed investment to grow more and provide a cushion to the economic slowdown. The bottom line is that the US economy has been cleared for landing, but in our opinion, it is unlikely to be as soft as many are predicting.

Read the full Investment Strategy Quarterly

All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the Chief Investment Office, and are subject to change. This information should not be construed as a recommendation. The foregoing content is subject to change at any time without notice. Content provided herein is for informational purposes only. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Asset allocation and diversification do not guarantee a profit nor protect against loss. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor’s results will vary. Investing in small cap stocks generally involves greater risks, and therefore, may not be appropriate for every investor. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well-established foreign markets. Investing in the energy sector involves special risks, including the potential adverse effects of state and federal regulation and may not be suitable for all investors. There is an inverse relationship between interest rate movements and fixed income prices. Generally, when interest rates rise, fixed income prices fall and when interest rates fall, fixed income prices rise. If bonds are sold prior to maturity, the proceeds may be more or less than original cost. A credit rating of a security is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to review, revisions, suspension, reduction or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency. Investing in REITs can be subject to declines in the value of real estate. Economic conditions, property taxes, tax laws and interest rates all present potential risks to real estate investments. The companies engaged in business related to a specific sector are subject to fierce competition and their products and services may be subject to rapid obsolescence.

Low Quality Growth

First Trust Monday Morning Outlook

Brian S. Wesbury - Chief Economist

Robert Stein, CFA - Dep. Chief Economist

January 8, 2024

Last Friday’s jobs report showed nonfarm payrolls up 216,000 in December, beating the consensus expected 175,000. Many are arguing that this was a huge number proving that the economy is not going into recession. But digging deeper into the data brings some doubt. In fact, it looks like the US is seeing low quality growth.

For example, yes, nonfarm payrolls came in better than expected in December, but not after adjusting for downward revisions of 71,000 to prior months. These downward revisions have now happened in ten out of the eleven past months. Over the past three months, private payrolls have increased a moderate 115,000 per month, tying for the slowest three-month pace of job gains since the COVID reopening started back in 2020.

What’s more, average hours worked by employees also fell by 0.2% in December. Despite more workers, we worked less in December than we did the month before, which is a headwind to growth. Losing 0.2% total hours of work is the equivalent to losing 228,000 jobs.

More importantly, the kind of jobs being added are of lower quality than we want. In 2023, nearly half of all jobs added were in the government and health care (which is heavily funded by government). Compare this to 2015 - 2019 (before COVID) when these two sectors accounted for a fifth of new jobs added.

Where else is the quality of growth low? Construction. Many people are talking about onshoring as manufacturing comes back to the US. Manufacturing facility construction is up 59.1% from a year ago and up 123.5% from two years ago. But this isn’t all private money. The government is funding many new projects, with the CHIPS Act and Inflation Reduction Act, artificially boosting spending in areas like manufacturing construction. But this deficit spending can’t last forever.

Real (inflation-adjusted) government purchases, which feed directly into the GDP numbers, are up 4.8% in the past year versus an average of 1.0% in the past twenty years. Meanwhile, recent government programs have been structured to multiply private-sector investment in politicallyfavored sectors, like “clean energy.” That, in turn, helped prop up economic performance last year – pushing out a recession that had looked likely to arrive at some point in 2023. But it’s low-quality growth that comes at a price. In order to spend on government favored projects, we must tax profitable entities in other areas. This redistribution does not add to growth, it just shifts it from one sector to another.

In fiscal year 2023, the U.S. government spent over $6.1 trillion dollars and ran a budget deficit of nearly $1.7 trillion dollars. That is fiscal madness. And it understates the true spending because the government was credited with a $333 billion “negative outlay” when the Supreme Court struck down President Biden’s plan to forgive student loans. Strip that out, and government spending in fiscal year 2023 represented roughly 24.0% of GDP. An incredibly high number for peacetime, especially for an economy that wasn’t in recession and had an unemployment rate below 4.0%.

It's only a matter of time before low quality growth stalls out. There are consequences to taking short term gains rather than fixing structural problems. Just ask California, Illinois, or New York.

In the meantime, the Federal Reserve is tasked with navigating treacherous terrain. Inflation is moderating but is still too high. The Fed’s choice to move from a scarce reserve system to a system of abundant reserves makes battling inflation that much tougher. And they are navigating with blinders on, willfully ignoring changes to the M2 money supply, down 3.0% in the past year.

We haven’t lost faith in the U.S. economy. Far from it. But we need to take an honest view on the sustainability of the current growth. For the sake of future progress, the government needs to stop digging the hole deeper and face issues head on. We will never beat China by trying to be like China. Government can never create wealth in the long run.

The attached information was developed by First Trust, an independent third party. The opinions are of the listed authors at First Trust Advisors L.P, and are independent from and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James.  All investments are subject to risk. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions, or forecasts provided in the attached article will prove to be correct. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Forward looking data is subject to change at any time and there is no assurance that projections will be realized. Any information provided is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected.

10 Themes That Will Affect Your 2024 Investing

Raymond James

Markets & Investing

January 02, 2024

As a new year begins, Raymond James CIO Larry Adam serves up his outlook on the financial markets.

To read the full article, see the Investment Strategy Quarterly publication linked below.

On Top Chef, one of America’s most popular kitchen competition television shows, contestants walk in with knowledge and experience – but no idea what challenges they are about to face. Their goal is to prepare a dish that pleases the expert chefs judging them, but the judges toss in a mix of ingredients that no contestant would expect. The aspiring chefs must think on their feet, improvise and beat the clock.

Sound familiar? Not only was fast footwork the investment story in 2023, the competition is set to get stiffer in 2024. Here are our 10 themes for 2024. Count on more than a few surprise ingredients throughout the year to spice up the financial markets.

1. U.S. economy: "Rotisserie" cycles

The most talked about recession in history has yet to materialize. Many economists have stopped waiting for the delivery and have revised the menu. We still believe that a recession will start in 2Q, but it will likely be the mildest ever. Indeed, it may be so mild that markets barely notice it. We expect the recession to be mild because there are no excesses in the economy, and like a rotisserie oven, many parts of the economy have been rotating from hot to cold independently over the last few years. Even with a mild recession, a recovery by year end should help U.S. GDP warm to a ~1% growth rate for the entire year.

2. Monetary policy: Chairman Powell, the top chef

The Federal Reserve (Fed) is led by our favorite Top Chef: Jerome Powell. Under pressure to cool inflation, he served up a steady course of interest rate hikes over the last 18 months and whipped inflation from 9% to 3.1% currently. Since that restrictive diet is done, the Fed will turn its attention to fattening the economy as growth concerns mount (i.e., a modest rise in unemployment and a potential recession). Markets are salivating over the possibility of as many as six interest rate cuts in 2024, but we believe that is overly optimistic; we favor three or four. More rate cuts than that would likely mean the economy is struggling more than we anticipate.

3. Fixed income: A makeover "rescue"

Like the guests on Bar Rescue, fixed income investors for the last few years may have felt like they were in bad shape, just like the shabby drinking establishments on the show. In both cases, the underlying business and fundamentals are in place and a makeover is all that’s needed. That makeover occurred in the bond market as the sharp reset to higher interest rates gave long-term investors an attractive entry point.

4. U.S. equities: The critical eye of Gordon Ramsay

In his show Hell’s Kitchen, Gordon Ramsay is often hyper critical of the contestants. Just as he has a discerning eye for cooking, investors will need to be more selective in 2024 with their sector, region, style, and market capitalization choices. That’s because a lot of the good news has already been priced into the market, including expectations for a soft landing, Fed rate cuts and easing inflation. Given our expectation for a mild recession, investors should turn a skeptical eye to a consensus earnings estimate of $245 (+12% EPS growth). We think that is likely too frothy. Our expectation is that earnings growth will be only 2% to $225 for 2024. History (i.e., election years, Fed easing cycle, etc.) suggests our less spicy expectations for the S&P 500 – to 4,850 by year end 2024 – make more sense.

5. Sectors: New ideas, richer flavors

With a slowing economic environment, earnings growth will be a decisive factor in determining sector performance. That’s why our 2024 ‘Michelin Star’ sectors are like America’s Test Kitchen: familiar spaces being improved by experimenting with new gadgets and ingredients.

6. Small-cap equities: Don't pass up the "dives"

On Diners, Drive-Ins and Dives, Guy Fieri fires up his bright red 1968 Chevy Camaro convertible and goes roaring around America to find great food in unexpected, small, relatively unknown places. While some ‘dive’ restaurants look ugly on the outside, the food and atmosphere on the inside make up for it. Underperforming small-cap equities may appear unappealing at first glance, but fundamentals under the surface make them worth visiting.

7. International equities: U.S. is "Grade A"

When looking at the global equity markets, U.S. equities are still our prime choice. Developed market international equities are ‘sale priced’ relative to U.S. equities, but growth headwinds could spoil earnings trends in the coming quarters, particularly in Europe. Japanese equities may be an outlier in 2024, underpinned by corporate governance reforms and an ongoing economic recovery. Emerging markets remain a long-term opportunity for investors. They should ripen with the end of the Fed tightening cycle, a modest weakening in the dollar and a rebound in economic growth in Asia and Latin America.

8. Energy: Discipline in the kitchen

Discipline is important when you’re wielding a sharp knife or cooking over an open flame. It’s even more important in the energy market. In 2023, OPEC+ was disciplined for controlling oil supply. And private companies – especially smaller ones – exercised careful capital discipline in drilling for additional oil. In general, we believe energy production discipline will continue to limit the growth of the oil supply.

9. Volatility: Turning up the heat

Volatility was relatively modest last year from a historical perspective. Why? Because of exceptional pessimism at the beginning of last year. Investors feared a recession, stubborn inflation, imploding corporate earnings and the Russia/Ukraine war. In retrospect, that pessimism was overstated; each of those dynamics had surprisingly more favorable outcomes – at least in the markets’ eyes. In 2024, we appear to have the opposite view: uber-optimism leaves the market vulnerable to disappointment. If you thought the kitchen was kind of warm last year, get ready for more volatility in 2024.

10. Asset allocation: Pace yourself at the buffet

We want investors to experience well-crafted fare, which is why we place so much attention on building an asset allocation that matches your tastes. We are factoring in a modest upside for most asset classes in 2024, but don’t let a so-called ‘everything rally’ distract you from maintaining a commitment to a well- structured asset allocation. Faced with a big buffet, it is tempting to splurge on whatever looks good today, ignoring a balanced, more healthy approach. Asset allocation strategies, for the most part, should be in place long term. They remind me of one of the most famous infomercial taglines of all time – the "Set and Forget It" rotisserie oven. "Set it and forget it" is great advice, particularly in challenging and more volatile markets. Timing is also important: decisive short- term moves can sometimes save a meal, but panic-driven actions can ruin it. That’s why, when it comes to a longer-term investment horizon, we prefer to let things marinate.

We look at the future like the mystery basket in Chopped – the ingredients inside could be anything. Creative chefs know how to work with what they are given. We encourage you to peek into our kitchen, with our updated views on what’s cooking, throughout the year. World-renowned chef Bobby Flay said: “Cooking is a subject you can never know enough about. There is always something new to discover.” Don’t let uncertainty scare you out of the market – turn to your sous-chef (AKA your financial advisor) – for support and guidance when things heat up.

Read the full Investment Strategy Quarterly

All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the Chief Investment Office, and are subject to change. This information should not be construed as a recommendation. The foregoing content is subject to change at any time without notice. Content provided herein is for informational purposes only. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Asset allocation and diversification do not guarantee a profit nor protect against loss. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor’s results will vary. Investing in small cap stocks generally involves greater risks, and therefore, may not be appropriate for every investor. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well-established foreign markets. Investing in the energy sector involves special risks, including the potential adverse effects of state and federal regulation and may not be suitable for all investors.

There is an inverse relationship between interest rate movements and fixed income prices. Generally, when interest rates rise, fixed income prices fall and when interest rates fall, fixed income prices rise. If bonds are sold prior to maturity, the proceeds may be more or less than original cost. A credit rating of a security is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to review, revisions, suspension, reduction or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency. Investing in REITs can be subject to declines in the value of real estate. Economic conditions, property taxes, tax laws and interest rates all present potential risks to real estate investments. The companies engaged in business related to a specific sector are subject to fierce competition and their products and services may be subject to rapid obsolescence.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

 Investments & Wealth Institute™ (The Institute) is the owner of the certification marks “CIMA” and “Certified Investment Management Analyst.” Use of CIMA and/or Certified Investment Management Analyst signifies that the user has successfully completed The Institute’s initial and ongoing credentialing requirements for investment management professionals.

 Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc. owns the certification marks CFP®, Certified Financial Planner™, CFP® (with plaque design) and CFP® (with flame design) in the U.S., which it awards to individuals who successfully complete CFP Board’s initial and ongoing certification requirements.

Investor Optimism Set the Tone for a Strong Finish to 2023

Raymond James

Markets & Investing

January 02, 2024

The S&P 500 reversed its 2022 losses, and then some, closing the year near a record high.

A choir of optimistic investor sentiment closed 2023 on a high note, as expectations of “steep cuts to interest rates” may be at odds with the Federal Reserve’s (Fed) actual sheet music. Considering the tumult of the year as sentiment focused on economic and inflation data, this discordance isn’t all that surprising and could signal volatility to come, but in the meantime, the market environment looks a lot brighter at the tail end of 2023 than it did at the close of a dreary 2022.

“December’s rally was fueled by a further deceleration in inflation and the Federal Reserve’s switch at the last FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) meeting of the year to a more dovish tone and talk of Fed interest rate cuts in 2024,” said Raymond James Chief Investment Officer Larry Adam. “However, it is important to put the positive year of performance into perspective: 2023 was a reset year as the over 25% return for the S&P 500 only recouped all the losses from 2022.”

While the Dow Jones Industrial Average notched seven record highs in 2023, the S&P 500 closed the year less than 1% from all-time highs. Tech-related sectors were the best performers for the year, as the NASDAQ Composite and its leading artificial intelligence stocks saw its best year since the 1999 tech bubble. And small-cap equities, which had been a significant underperformer for the year, showed signs of a resurgence as it was the best performer in the fourth quarter.

Still, it may be too soon to celebrate the Fed engineering a “soft landing” – a return to the target inflation rate without a recession. For one, inflation remains above the 2.0% target. Two, the lagging effects of its rate hike program continue to cool economic activity. And three, the repercussions of higher economic growth or any other geopolitical event with the potential to disrupt food and energy prices could directly influence inflation and shape future Fed policy.

But even a conservative reading of the Fed’s messaging suggests interest rate cuts to come through 2024. That said, the Fed has demonstrated its commitment to calming inflationary pressures, it appears they are turning their attention to the economy where there are more and more signs of the economy slowing.

Before we continue, let’s take a final look at 2023 by the numbers.

*Performance reflects index values as of market close on December 29, 2023. 

Composite index points to recession

The Leading Economic Index, a composite index from The Conference Board that seeks to forecast turning points in the business cycle, declined for its 20th consecutive month in November, weakening further than expected. The Conference Board said it expects a “short and shallow recession in the first half of 2024.”  

Movement suggests broadening equity market growth

To a significant degree, the incredible performance of a small formation of high-flying, mega-cap tech stocks propped up headline equity indices through 2023, providing a sense of a stronger market than experienced by a more diversified position. The average stock, by comparison, has been in a two-year bear market. Recent activity since the start of the October rally suggests positive movement below the surface, meaning 2024 could bring more opportunity for those stocks left behind. December saw 10 of the 11 sectors finish in the green, with interest-rate sensitive sectors leading the way.

Treasury yields lowered as sentiment improves

Fixed income prices soared, continuing to demonstrate the strength of the market through December. Reflecting improving expectations, the yield on the 5-year Treasury ended November at 4.27% and closed December at 3.85%. The 10-year yield declined from 4.33% to 3.88%. The year’s high interest rates allowed investors an opportunity to lock in elevated income levels while the year-ending price strength provided those participants with positive total returns.

Waning OPEC+ vigilance brings oil prices down

Production discipline among the OPEC+ group, amid a return to pre-COVID demand, has been slipping, bringing oil prices to near 2023 lows in December. Particularly, Saudi Arabia and Russia have expressed displeasure at smaller OPEC members that are flagrantly producing beyond their quota levels, cheating the cartel, in effect.

European central banks yet to message lowering rates

Like the U.S.’s Fed, the European Central Bank and Bank of England held monetary conditions steady through December as economic activity continues to slow. Meanwhile, large-cap equities – particularly German stocks – dashed upward to close the year with strength, as the Eurostoxx 600, a composite index of 600 European stocks, hit 23-month highs. Unlike the Fed, the British and European monetary authorities have not signaled the lowering of interest rates. Investor sentiment has swung toward a growth outlook but fears that higher-for-longer rates could unnecessarily deepen and lengthen a recession could cause investor sentiment to rapidly reverse.  

U.S. and China resume military-to-military talks

An agreement to resume military-to-military communication secured in November at the meeting of President Joe Biden and President Xi Jinping came to fruition in December, ending a 17-month communications impasse between the two world powers’ armed forces. This is generally seen as supporting stability, as military-to-military communications can act as a critical avenue for addressing miscommunications and flare-ups around key geopolitical flashpoints, such as in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea.

The bottom line

At this time last year, no one could have projected the highs and lows that would follow – the incredible first two quarters, the midsummer reversal, then the even more remarkable end-of-year rally. We start 2024 in much stronger position, owing to the progress made on inflation, and that’s heartening – strength often begets strength. However, sluggish economic growth and the potential for investor sentiment to suddenly shift are potential risks, as is the potential of a recession. That’s worth remembering, even when the forecast is clear.

Investing involves risk, and investors may incur a profit or a loss. All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the authors and are subject to change. There is no assurance the trends mentioned will continue or that the forecasts discussed will be realized. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Economic and market conditions are subject to change. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is an unmanaged index of 30 widely held stocks. The NASDAQ Composite Index is an unmanaged index of all common stocks listed on the NASDAQ National Stock Market. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks. The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia and Far East) index is an unmanaged index that is generally considered representative of the international stock market. The Russell 2000 is an unmanaged index of small-cap securities. The Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based flagship benchmark that measures the investment grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market. An investment cannot be made in these indexes. The performance mentioned does not include fees and charges, which would reduce an investor’s returns. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Investing in oil involves special risks, including the potential adverse effects of state and federal regulation and may not be suitable for all investors. U.S. government bonds and Treasury notes are guaranteed by the U.S. government and, if held to maturity, offer a fixed rate of return and guaranteed principal value. U.S. government bonds are issued and guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest by the federal government. Treasury notes are certificates reflecting  intermediate-term (2 -10 years) obligations of the U.S. government. Companies engaged in business related to the technology sector are subject to fierce competition and their products and services may be subject to rapid obsolescence.

Material created by Raymond James for use by its advisors.

The Housing Outlook: 2024

First Trust Monday Morning Outlook

Brian S. Wesbury - Chief Economist

Robert Stein, CFA - Dep. Chief Economist

January 2, 2024

Just because we still think the economy is headed for a recession, doesn’t mean we think the housing market is going to get killed.

The housing market was a mixed bag in 2023: housing starts and existing home sales were weak, while new home sales and home prices rose, in spite of the highest mortgage rates in twenty years. This year we expect modest gains almost all around: modest gains in housing starts, modest gains in sales, and modest gains in prices.

A recession, by itself, would have a negative effect on housing. But there are so many other factors affecting housing that we think the sector would weather the economic storm.

In terms of construction, builders started fewer homes in 2023 than in 2022, which was already down from the COVID peak in 2021. But builders have been consistently building too few homes since the bursting of the housing bubble about fifteen years ago. As a result, we expect a turnaround in 2024. However, the gains should be concentrated in single-family homes; the number of multi-family homes (think apartments and condos) under construction is at an all-time high already.

In terms of sales, it would be hard for the existing home market to get any worse in 2024. Sales have been handcuffed in 2022-23, for two reasons. First, temporary indigestion as mortgage rates rose. Second, homeowners who borrowed money at rock-bottom mortgage rates in 2020-21 have been very reluctant to sell. Who in their right mind would give up a mortgage with a fixed rate of something like 2.75% locked in for fifteen or even thirty years?

But with each passing year a gradually smaller share of homeowners will be locked in with those rock-bottom mortgage rates. Some of them will move anyhow, for one reason or another. In addition, mortgage rates should be lower this year than in 2023, helping boost sales among some prospective buyers and sellers.

Meanwhile, new home sales were up in 2023 and should continue to grow in 2024. Lower mortgage rates should help a little, as will the construction of more single-family homes.

The biggest surprise in the housing market last year was that prices increased consistently after falling in the second half of 2022. Through the first ten months of 2023, the national Case-Shiller index and the FHFA index were both up roughly 6.0%. We think the continued resilience of home prices largely reflects a lack of supply. However, a faster pace of construction in 2024 should put a ceiling on price gains in the year ahead.

The business cycle hasn’t been normal since COVID hit in 2020. COVID led to a massive surge in government stimulus, both monetary and fiscal, to fight widespread and overly draconian shutdowns. That was followed by tighter money in 2022-23, although government spending has continued to gush. Meanwhile, in certain ways, housing is still recovering from the housing bust that followed the bubble that peaked before the Financial Crisis in 2008-09.

Put it all together and we have a recipe for general improvement in housing even as the rest of the US economy slows down.

The attached information was developed by First Trust, an independent third party. The opinions are of the listed authors at First Trust Advisors L.P, and are independent from and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James.  All investments are subject to risk. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions, or forecasts provided in the attached article will prove to be correct. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Forward looking data is subject to change at any time and there is no assurance that projections will be realized. Any information provided is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected.

Office Holiday Closure

Thanks to all our clients for an amazing year! We look forward to continuing to serve you and help you achieve your goals in 2024. Raymond James offices and the market are closed on Monday, January 1, in observance of New Year's Day.

Tax-efficient strategies for investment properties

Raymond James

Family & Lifestyle

3 smart ways to defer capital gains taxes.

One of the benefits of purchasing property as an investment is the tax benefits that can come with it – both while you own it and after you sell. Applying tax-efficient strategies will help you make the most out of your investment property.

Most such strategies require planning and preparations to be put in place, so you’ll want to do your due diligence and consult with your advisor and other professionals before you assume these strategies apply to your situation.

How to defer capital gains taxes

There are three strategies to consider if you’re seeking ways to defer capital gains taxes upon the purchase or sale of your investment property.

Qualified opportunity zones (QOZ): QOZs are economically distressed communities where new investments, under certain conditions, may be eligible for preferential tax treatment. They're designed to spawn economic development by providing incentives to individual investors or businesses putting capital into the locality. There are more than 8,700 QOZs to invest in across the United States. To get the tax deferral, you must invest through a Qualified Opportunity Fund. Once the property is sold, the seller has 180 days to invest the gains in the fund, and the investment must not be in exchange for debt interest, only equity interest.

1031 like-kind exchange: A 1031 (as they’re commonly called) is a strategy to defer taxes by reinvesting the capital in a “like-kind” property. Proceeds from the sale of a property are held in escrow by a third-party intermediary and used to buy a new property. There are several qualifications that must be met for this exchange. First, the new property must be within the United States and be of similar nature and character to the old property. It must also have a value that is equal to or greater than the old property for maximum benefit and to avoid capital gains taxes completely. The new property must be identified in writing to the intermediary within 45 days of the original property’s sale and you must close on the new property within 180 days of the sale of the original property. These exchanges must be performed without error to avoid owing taxes, so consult your financial advisor and tax professionals.

Installment sales: Another way to help maximize tax efficiency on the sale of an investment property is a payment agreement with the buyer where the buyer makes payments in installments with interest over time. This breaks up the income earned and defers taxes until later years. Installment sales start with partial payment the year following the actual sale. Typically you can get a higher selling price than you would with an all-cash sale and you’ll be collecting interest. Of course, there are some risks for extending payments over time, like risk of default on the arrangement, capital being tied up for a period of time and market and interest rate fluctuations, which could lead to lost income. But the tax benefits may outweigh these risks.

Other investment property tax strategies

There are other opportunities to make your investment property purchase or sale tax efficient. A simple strategy with less formality is to sell your property during lower income years. This will allow you to be taxed in a lower tax bracket than usual, saving on capital gains taxes.

If charitable giving is in your heart and part of your financial strategy, you could contribute to a donor advised fund (DAF). You can make a contribution and enjoy the tax break immediately but decide which nonprofits to donate to later on.

There's also an opportunity to qualify for a low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) by developing housing targeted at lower income tenants. LIHTC gives investors a dollar-for-dollar reduction in their federal tax liability for providing financing to develop affordable housing for low-income individuals.

One of the benefits of owning investment property is flexibility when it comes to taxes. With a bit of preparation and knowledge, you can decrease your tax burden and maximize your investment. It’s wise to speak with your advisor and other professionals to determine which tax strategies make the most sense for your situation.

Sources: opportunityzones.hud.gov; irs.gov; investopedia.com; seracapital.com; forbes.com; novoco.com

The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete, it is not a statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision, and it does not constitute a recommendation.

Every investor's situation is unique and you should consider your investment goals, risk tolerance and time horizon before making any investment. Prior to making an investment decision, please consult with your financial advisor about your individual situation.

Donors are urged to consult their attorneys, accountants or tax advisors with respect to questions relating to the deductibility of various types of contributions to a Donor-Advised Fund for federal and state tax purposes.

Please note, changes in tax laws may occur at any time and could have a substantial impact upon each person's situation. While we are familiar with the tax provisions of the issues presented herein, as Financial Advisors of Raymond James, we are not qualified to render advice on tax or legal matters. You should discuss tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

How Does SECURE Act 2.0 Change Saving for Retirement?

Raymond James

Retirement & Longevity

Washington Policy Analyst Ed Mills outlines key components of the new legislation.

The year-end fiscal 2023 government funding bill contained legislation that makes the most significant changes to the U.S. retirement savings system in decades. The SECURE 2.0 Act builds on retirement savings changes passed in 2019 and contains new provisions that further raise the required minimum distribution (RMD) age, shift to automatic plan enrollment and provide for new matching/emergency withdrawal opportunities.

Most of the key provisions are effective in the 2024-2025 timeframe, but smaller adjustments (such as increasing to 73 the age for starting RMDs) are effective in 2023.

The SECURE 2.0 Act is the second bipartisan bill designed to boost access to retirement savings.

The SECURE 2.0 Act is a follow-up bill to the original SECURE Act passed in 2019, which began the process of increasing the RMD age from 70 1/2 and increasing participation in retirement savings plans through various tax incentives. The Act also eased administrative rules for employer-sponsored retirement plans.

The new legislation goes well beyond the original iteration and seeks to expand participation in retirement savings plans through mandatory enrollments, as well as increased flexibility in the individual use of advantaged savings accounts. The Act also extends the savings timeframe before RMDs are required to age 75 by 2033 – an almost five-year increase from the original RMD distribution age.

Overall, the changes enacted by the legislation (to be phased in over a multiyear period) are likely to boost the asset base for asset managers through increased participation and interest in retirement savings plans.

Key changes will be phased in over a multiyear period. 

The Act also features an allowance for matching contributions to be made for student loan payments (expanding the retirement savings of younger adults), higher catch-up limits for those ages 60-63, and additional opportunities for penalty-free withdrawals and lower penalties for missed RMDs that are corrected.

Eligible employees will soon be automatically enrolled into new employer-sponsored retirement plans. Under-the-radar provisions in SECURE 2.0 include an expansion of multiple employer plans (MEPs) and pooled employer plans (PEPs) to include 403(b)s, 529 to Roth IRA rollovers (to a maximum of $35,000), and employer-offered de minimis financial incentives (such as gift cards or other financial awards) to increase employee participation in retirement plans.

Here are more detailed descriptions of the key provisions in SECURE 2.0:

• Automatic enrollment: Eligible employees are required to be automatically enrolled in new 401(k) and 403(b) retirement savings plans with a contribution between 3% and 10%, rising by 1% annually (up to 15%) unless employees opt out. Automatic enrollment is effective starting 2025.

• Higher RMD age: The RMD age increases to 73 in 2023 and 74 in 2030, and bumps to 75 in 2033.

• MEP and PEP access for 403(b) plans: Access to multiple employer plans (MEPs) and pooled employer plans (PEPs) is expanded to include 403(b) plans.

• Matching contributions for employee student loan payments: Plan sponsors may make matching contributions to 401(k), 403(b) and simple IRA plans for qualified student loan payments made by employees effective 2024.

• Expanded emergency expense distribution allowances: Emergency distributions of up to $1,000 are permitted for unforeseeable or immediate financial needs relating to personal or family emergency expenses once per year, to be paid back within three years (effective 2024).

• Tax-free and penalty-free rollover from 529 to Roth IRA: Beneficiaries of 529 college savings accounts are permitted to rollover up to $35,000 from a 529 account in their name to a Roth IRA account. Rollovers are subject to IRA annual contribution limits and are available for 529 accounts that have been open for more than 15 years. Rollovers are permitted starting 2024.

• Reduced penalty for failure to take RMDs: The 50% tax penalty for failure to take RMDs is reduced to 25%. For IRAs, the tax is further reduced to 10% if corrected. Reduction is effective as of the bill’s signing.

• Higher catch-up contribution allowances. For those ages 60-63, the catch-up contribution limit is raised to the greater of $10,000 or 50% higher than the regular catch-up amount. The higher allowance is effective starting 2025.

• Emergency withdrawals for domestic abuse survivors: Emergency withdrawals for the expenses of individuals escaping domestic abuse situations are provided at the lesser of $10,000 or 50% of the value of the account, to be repaid over three years with a refund of income taxes paid on the repaid amount. Withdrawals permitted starting 2024.

• Emergency withdrawals for disaster relief: Withdrawals of up to $22,000 from employer retirement accounts or IRAs are permitted for individuals affected by a federally declared disaster. These emergency-related withdrawals are permitted for disasters occurring on or after January 26, 2021.

• Expanded administrative cost tax credit for new businesses: A 50% tax credit for administrative costs incurred by new businesses is raised to 100% for companies with 50 or fewer employees effective 2023.

• Employer-offered incentives: De minimis financial incentives (such as gift cards or other financial awards) are permitted for sponsor efforts to boost employee participation in retirement savings plans, effective as of the signing of the bill into law.

A Mild Recession and S&P 4,500

First Trust Monday Morning Outlook

Brian S. Wesbury - Chief Economist

Robert Stein, CFA - Dep. Chief Economist

December 26, 2023

Very early this year our economics team got a pleasant surprise: Consensus Economics, which collects forecasts from roughly 200 economists around the world, rated us the most accurate forecasters of the United States for 2022, based on our forecasts for GDP and CPI. Unfortunately, we don’t expect a repeat award for 2023.

For 2022, we saw inflation and continued moderate growth. We were right. This past year, in 2023, we anticipated economic weakness late in the year, and put our S&P 500 target at 3,900. Instead, the economy remained resilient and stocks rallied much more than we thought. As we said a year ago: “if it turns out that Chairman Powell and the Federal Reserve have engineered a soft landing – no recession in 2023 and with the market ending 2023 confident of not having a recession in 2024 – then stocks should rally substantially in 2023 and easily beat our S&P 500 target of 3,900.” Today, that’s what most stock market investors are thinking: a soft landing has been achieved and they should therefore be optimistic about the future.

But we don’t think the economy is out of the woods yet. The consensus among economists is now that the economy will continue to grow in 2024, with a soft landing and no recession. We think that’s too bullish and see a mild recession with a -0.5% real GDP print on the way for 2024.

The yield curve has been inverted for more than a year and is likely to remain so well into 2024 and the M2 measure of the money supply is down 3.3% from a year ago, while commercial & industrial loans have also declined. Commercial construction has been temporarily and artificially supported by government subsidies in the past couple of years and should soon start faltering. Payrolls have grown very fast in the past year even with an unusually low unemployment rate, suggesting that businesses have over-hired.

Meanwhile, consumer spending looks set to slow. Government payouts, rent and student loan moratoriums, and temporary tax cuts during COVID led to bloated overall savings for many consumers. In turn, they could relax in 2022-23 and save a smaller part of their ongoing earnings than they normally would. But the artificial boost from these government actions is likely to finally run out in 2024, which suggests to us consumer spending will moderate significantly in 2024.

It's also important to realize how much the federal budget deficit expanded last year. The official deficit was about $1.7 trillion in FY 2023 but would have been $2.0 trillion if it hadn’t been for the Supreme Court striking down much of President Biden’s plan to forgive student loans. But that Court decision didn’t change the government’s cash flow; the Education Department just wrote up the value of its loan portfolio. In other words, the underlying cash flow situation for the federal government was no different than if we had run a deficit of $2.0 trillion, or about 7.4% of GDP. For last year, in FY 2022, excluding the student loan scoring, the deficit was about 4.0% of GDP. That’s a huge one-year spike in the deficit, which temporarily lifted spending.

But this won’t continue. The budget deficit won’t grow again in 2024, given the rally in stocks in 2023, big tax payments are likely due, which takes away this temporary stimulus.

What will happen to inflation? We think it keeps heading down in 2024 and may even finish the year at, or perhaps even temporarily below, the Federal Reserve’s 2.0% target. However, if we do hit 2.0% don’t expect to stay there for long. The Fed is likely to cut rates about as aggressively as the futures market now projects, about 150 basis points in 2024. And, unless the money supply keeps falling, inflation is likely to move back up in 2025 (and beyond); above the Fed’s 2.0% target.

What does this mean for stocks? The good news for stocks is that if the economy is weaker than expected and inflation keeps heading down, long-term interest rates will tend to decline, as well. That’s important because our Capitalized Profits Model takes nationwide profits from the GDP report and discounts them by the 10-year US Treasury yield, to calculate fair value.

If we use a 10-year Treasury yield of 3.50% the model says the S&P 500 is fairly valued, with current profits, at about 4,450. In other words, for the first time in many years, the US stock market is very close to fair value. And, the path of both profits and 10-year Treasury yields, in the next year, is uncertain.

We expect profits to be weaker than the consensus expects in 2024, and with Fed rate cuts of 150 basis points, the 10-year to end the year around 3.5%. Putting this all together, including the fact that the S&P 500 closed on Friday at 4,754, we think it finishes 2024 at 4,500, or lower.

Remember, this is not a trading model, and it doesn’t mean investors should run out and sell all their stocks, it just means investors need to be selective. The past few years have been the most difficult time to forecast in our careers. The US economy has never gone through COVID lockdowns before, plus a reopening, along with such massive peacetime fiscal and monetary stimulus. We understand many think we can do all this with little, or no, significant impact on the economy. We don’t believe this conventional wisdom. 2024 will be a tough year.

The attached information was developed by First Trust, an independent third party. The opinions are of the listed authors at First Trust Advisors L.P, and are independent from and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James.  All investments are subject to risk. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions, or forecasts provided in the attached article will prove to be correct. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Forward looking data is subject to change at any time and there is no assurance that projections will be realized. Any information provided is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected.

Office Holiday Closure

Merry Christmas! May your celebrations be filled with peace, joy and time spent with those you cherish most. Our office and the market are closed Monday, December 25, in observance of Christmas Day.

Make Data Privacy a Priority in 2024

Raymond James

Technology & Innovation

As our lives become more digitally integrated, our data becomes more valuable.

Often, data collectors say that the vast amount of information they take in is tightly secured or anonymized before it is packaged and resold. However, MIT researchers discovered in 2018 that individuals could be identified by combining two anonymized data sets covering the same population. A 2019 series from The New York Times went further, exposing the risk to privacy on a massive scale if a major tech firm’s anonymized location data was stolen and cross-referenced to publicly available property records.

As long as consumers’ concerns about privacy remain limited, there is little incentive for companies to cull their data collecting habits. When buying a new smart device such as a phone, tablet or computer or using a new service, look into its commitment to privacy. The market for such devices is growing, but at the moment they tend to be on the premium side of the product spectrum. Expect that to change as this topic gains traction.

In the meantime, here are some best practices to help minimize the amount of your information that data collectors can access.

Turn off personalized ads

Many of the largest ad space sellers, particularly those providing tech services like email and social media, now give the option to depersonalize your advertising experience. They’ll still collect the information, but there are some limits to how specifically targeted the ads can be. This is becoming a battleground topic in the tech industry, as companies that don’t rely on ad sales are finding privacy to be a strong selling point.

Skip the quiz

That silly online quiz to help you determine which fast food mascot you are may be mining serious information about you. Though it’s a bad practice, many online accounts rely on security questions to establish your identity, questions that are easily snuck into online quizzes.

Go digital and shred the rest

Your home or driveway may be advertising your wealth, making your mailbox and your trash a target. Despite the well-publicized thefts of user data in recent years, an online account is in many ways more secure than an unlocked mailbox, and generally less personal. Privacy experts recommend making the switch, and when you do get mail that contains information about your health, finances or family, make sure to shred it before you toss it.

Know what health data is being collected

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, protects the information shared with your care provider. There is no similar regulation for health data you share with your fitness device manufacturer. It’s worth your while to make sure you understand what information is being collected and for what purposes. Go into the device settings to see what options you have. The EULA, or end-user license agreement, will have more information if you can read legalese. 

Sources: The New York Times; Vox; The Washington Post; Fast Company; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Consumer Reports; NPR; Goldman Sachs; ZDNet.com

Financial Resolutions for 2024

Raymond James

Retirement & Longevity

Start the new year right by reviewing and revamping your financial plan.

Instead of hauling out those familiar New Year’s resolutions about keeping a journal or drinking more water, how about focusing on your financial well-being? Here’s a set of resolutions that can help ensure your long-term financial confidence.

Update your beneficiaries

If you don’t correctly document your beneficiary designations, who gets what may be determined by federal or state law, or by the default plan document used in your retirement accounts. When did you last update your designations? Have life changes (divorce, remarriage, births, deaths, state of residence) occurred since then?

Update your beneficiary listings on wills, life insurance, annuities, IRAs, 401(k)s, qualified plans and anything else that’d affect your heirs. If you’ve named a trust, have any relevant tax laws changed? Have you provided for the possibility that your primary beneficiary may die before you? Does your plan address the simultaneous death of you and your spouse? An estate attorney can help walk you through these various scenarios.

Create flexible liquidity

Cash has inflation and opportunity tradeoffs, but a lack of access can cause greater problems if you find yourself needing to draw from your investments. Finding a balance in line with your life and goals is important to avoid disrupting your long-term plans.

The right liquidity strategy will be different for every investor and could incorporate cash reserves, cash alternatives, highly liquid securities, lines of credit, margin loans or even structured lending. Multiple institutions and account owners can be used to hold more than $250,000 with FDIC guarantees.

Evaluate your retirement progress

What changes are needed given your current lifestyle and the market environment? Don’t fixate solely on your assets’ value – instead, drill down into what types of securities you hold, your expected cash flows, your contingency plans, your assumed rate of return, inflation rates and how long you’re planning for. Retirement plans have many moving parts that must be monitored on an ongoing basis.

Reviw your account titling

Haphazard account titling can create problems down the line. If one partner dies and an account is titled only in their name, those assets can’t be readily accessed by the survivor. The solution may be creating joint accounts, but it’s not always that simple. Titling has implications across a range of estate planning issues, as well as other situations such as Medicaid eligibility and borrowing power, too.

Develop a charitable strategy

Giving comes from the heart, but you can also do well when doing good. For example, consider whether or not it’d make sense to donate low-basis stocks in lieu of cash, or learn about establishing a donor advised fund to take an upfront deduction for contributions made over the next several years. Give, but do so with an eye toward reducing your tax liability.

Spark a family conversation

Sustaining the benefits of wealth for generations is nearly impossible without a mutual understanding among family members. Consider creating a family mission statement that outlines the shared vision for your wealth and legacy. This should include nonfinancial topics, too, like your values, expectations and important life lessons.

Digitize your record keeping

You likely receive emails, letters reports and updates from multiple accounts. Consider going paperless and centralizing important files in one place to reduce frustration and ensure easy access when needed. Your advisor may have access to secure storage tools that can help.

Invest with your values

Your portfolio should reflect what matters to you – and that can mean anything from avoiding particular industries to actively pursuing an ESG (environmental, social and governance) investing approach. So whether you want to promote the transition to clean energy, advocate for diversity and inclusion in the workplace, or support companies with strong data privacy practices, your portfolio can be tailored to reflect those priorities.

Check in with your advisor

Your advisor can offer specialized tools, impartiality and experience earned by dealing with many market cycles and client situations. Communicate openly about what’s happening in your life today and what may happen in the future. It’s difficult to manage what they aren’t aware of, so err on the side of over-communicating and establish a regular check-in schedule for the year ahead.

These suggestions are a helpful starting point, but no two long-term plans are identical – so reach out to your advisor for more specific guidance about progressing toward your goals in 2024.

Investing involves risk, and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of the strategy selected. Not all investments or strategies mentioned are suitable for all investors.

Donors are urged to consult their attorneys, accountants or tax advisors with respect to questions relating to the deductibility of various types of contributions to a donor advised fund for federal and state tax purposes.

To learn more about the potential risks and benefits of donor advised funds, please contact your advisor.

Raymond James and its advisors do not offer tax or legal advice. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

Greedy Innkeeper or Generous Capitalist?

First Trust Monday Morning Outlook

Brian S. Wesbury - Chief Economist

Robert Stein, CFA - Dep. Chief Economist

December 18, 2023

The Bible story of the virgin birth is at the center of much of the holiday cheer this time of year. The book of Luke tells us that Mary and Joseph traveled to Bethlehem because Caesar Augustus decreed a census should be taken. Mary gave birth after arriving in Bethlehem and placed baby Jesus in a manger because there was “no room for them in the inn.”

Some people think Mary and Joseph were mistreated by a greedy innkeeper, who only cared about profits and decided the couple was not “worth” his normal accommodations. This version of the story (narrative) has been repeated many times in plays, skits, and sermons. It fits an anti-capitalist mentality that paints business owners as greedy, or even evil.

It persists even though the Bible records no complaints and there was apparently no charge for the stable. It may be the stable was the only place available. Bethlehem was over-crowded with people forced to return to their ancestral home for a census – ordered by the Romans – for the purpose of levying taxes. If there was a problem, it was due to unintended consequences of government policy. In this narrative, the government caused the problem.

The innkeeper was generous to a fault – a hero even. He was over-booked, but he charitably offered his stable, a facility he built with unknowing foresight. The innkeeper was willing and able to offer this facility even as government officials, who ordered and administered the census, slept in their own beds with little care for the well-being of those who had to travel regardless of their difficult life circumstances.

If you must find “evil” in either of these narratives, remember that evil is ultimately perpetrated by individuals, not the institutions in which they operate. And this is why it’s important to favor economic and political systems that limit the use and abuse of power over others. In the story of baby Jesus, a government law that requires innkeepers to always have extra rooms, or to take in anyone who asks, would “fix” the problem.

But these laws would also have unintended consequences. Fewer investors would back hotels because the cost of the regulations would reduce returns on investment. A hotel big enough to handle the rare census would be way too big in normal times. Even a bed and breakfast would face the potential of being sued. There would be fewer hotel rooms, prices would rise, and innkeepers would once again be called greedy. And if history is our guide, government would chastise them for price-gouging and then try to regulate prices.

This does not mean free markets are perfect or create utopia; they aren’t and they don’t. But businesses can’t force you to buy a service or product. You have a choice – even if it’s not exactly what you want. And good business people try to make you happy in creative and industrious ways.

Government doesn’t always care. In fact, if you happen to live in North Korea or Cuba, and are not happy about the way things are going, you can’t leave. And just in case you try, armed guards will help you think things through.

This is why the Framers of the US Constitution made sure there were “checks and balances” in our system of government. These checks and balances don’t always lead to good outcomes; we can think of many times when some wanted to ignore these safeguards. But, over time, the checks and balances help prevent the kinds of despotism we’ve seen develop elsewhere.

Neither free market capitalism, nor the checks and balances of the Constitution are the equivalent of having a true Savior. But they should give us all hope that the future will be brighter than many seem to think.

(We’ve published a version of this same Monday Morning Outlook during Christmas week, each year, since 2009.)

The attached information was developed by First Trust, an independent third party. The opinions are of the listed authors at First Trust Advisors L.P, and are independent from and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James.  All investments are subject to risk. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions, or forecasts provided in the attached article will prove to be correct. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Forward looking data is subject to change at any time and there is no assurance that projections will be realized. Any information provided is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected.

What Should the Fed Do? How About Nothing?

First Trust Monday Morning Outlook

Brian S. Wesbury - Chief Economist

Robert Stein, CFA - Dep. Chief Economist

December 11, 2023

For the first time in roughly fifteen years, interest rates in the United States are about right. In economics, we call it the “neutral” or “natural” rate. The Taylor Rule says rates should be higher, and our model that uses nominal GDP growth (real GDP plus inflation) says the same thing. But both these models rely on data that is still distorted by COVID.

A simpler approach is to assume interest rates should be “Inflation Plus.” If we judge current inflation using an average of the Cleveland Median CPI (up 5.3% from a year ago) and overall total CPI (up 3.2% from a year ago) we get 4.2%. “Plus 1%” says rates should be roughly 5.2%. And that’s almost exactly where the federal funds rate is today.

This is a big change. Between 2008 and today, the Federal Reserve held the funds rate below inflation roughly 83% of the time. These excessively low rates have created problems.

Banks have hundreds of billions of dollars of mark-to-market losses and government-funded green new deal projects are facing serious problems because they are not profitable at current neutral interest rates. In other words, holding rates down artificially, like the Fed did for years, may make things look OK, but it can’t last forever.

At the same time, the Fed grew the M2 measure of money so rapidly in 2020-21 that inflation was easy to see coming. But now the M2 measure of money is contracting. So, with money contracting and interest rates near normal, it seems appropriate to pause. Especially given the fact that tighter money seems to be helping inflation come back down from its post COVID spike.

But it is certainly not time to claim victory and return to an environment of artificially low rates. That would risk repeating the 1970s, when Arthur Burns cut rates before eradicating inflation. If, as we suspect, the US economy enters recession in 2024, the political pressure on the Fed to cut rates and restart QE will be intense. But it would be a big mistake unless inflation continues to fall and thereby reduce the “neutral” interest rate. All it would do is continue the mistakes of the past fifteen years.

One interesting thing we have observed is how much bank regulators, Fed members, and Treasury officials have shifted their thinking. Back in 2008, Hank Paulson, Ben Bernanke and Sheila Bair religiously adhered to mark-to-market (MTM) accounting. We still blame this accounting convention for the financial panic that ensued. But that panic was used to justify growing the Fed’s balance sheet by trillions of dollars with QE and supporting TARP, which grew the size of the federal government.

These policies were supposed to make the US financial system safer, but they didn’t. Because the Fed became so powerful and flooded the banking system with deposits (at artificially low rates), bank balance sheets now have an estimated $675 billion in losses on them.

Interestingly (and thankfully) banks don’t have to mark these assets to market anymore. It would wipe out almost a third of bank capital. But what happened to all these MTM believers? Did they only believe in MTM accounting when they could blame it on banks? Now that it is clear the Fed’s policies caused the losses, are they trying to avoid blame?

The bottom line is that those who think the Fed can just manage its way out this easily, cutting rates to offset the pain of recession (or avoid one entirely), may not be correct. Many seem to have submitted to “state-run capitalism.” But history shows it has never really worked. The Fed is likely to “do nothing” this week and holding that position in 2024 might not be a bad thing.

The attached information was developed by First Trust, an independent third party. The opinions are of the listed authors at First Trust Advisors L.P, and are independent from and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James.  All investments are subject to risk. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions, or forecasts provided in the attached article will prove to be correct. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Forward looking data is subject to change at any time and there is no assurance that projections will be realized. Any information provided is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected.

Equities Rebound in November, Ending a Three-Month Slide

Raymond James

Markets & Investing

November 30, 2023

The S&P 500 recorded eight consecutive days of gains during the month, its longest stretch since 2021.

A monthlong feast, November had a dish to suit nearly every taste. The four-week rally sent major market indices to near or beyond the year-to-date peaks reached at the end of the second quarter.

What summoned this cornucopia? The right mix of good data and “bad” data. The good data: The Consumer Price Index tallied the inflation rate to be 3.2%, well off its recent high of over 9% in June 2022. The “bad” data: softer than expected economic performance, which led the S&P 500 to record eight consecutive days of gains, its longest streak since 2021. This was taken as an indicator that the Federal Reserve (Fed) would decline to raise its benchmark interest rate another tick, as had been expected by many investors.

“We believe this interest rate tightening cycle is at an end,” Raymond James Chief Investment Officer Larry Adam said. “The next move will likely be to cut rates. However, we do not expect cuts until later in 2024.”

Equity gains were felt broadly — not just among the rarefied club of large technology companies with lines of business in AI — as small-cap and international equities posted strong returns for the month.

The fixed income markets had a seat at the table, too, with the Bloomberg Aggregate Bond Index erasing year-to-date losses and sidestepping, at least temporarily, three consecutive years of negative performance. The yield on the 10-year Treasury settled around the 4.29% mark after briefly touching 5% in late October.

Before we explore deeper, let’s review where we are as we get ready to close out the calendar year:

*Performance reflects index values as of market close on November 30, 2023. Bloomberg Aggregate Bond and MSCI EAFE reflect November 29, 2023, figures. 

Jobs, manufacturing foretell weakening economy

Nonfarm employment increased by 150,000 jobs in October, less than half of September’s 336,000, and the unemployment rate ticked up from 3.8% in September to 3.9%. Meanwhile, key manufacturing indicators showed declining performance in October and the Leading Economic Index, a proxy for the future performance of the U.S. economy, decreased for the 19th consecutive month.

An international sigh of relief

November saw the easing of a number of fears that had driven international markets to retreat in October. Inflationary pressures decreased broadly, suggesting central bankers’ “higher-for-longer” interest rate strategies may be slackened earlier rather than later. In the Middle East, the Israel-Hamas conflict has not snowballed across the region, which seemed a distinct possibility last month, and oil prices have not spiked as a result of the conflict. And a meeting between President Joe Biden and President Xi Jinping in San Francisco helped reduce tension between the two superpowers. Taken together, this helped support equity rallies across the international markets.

With oil, it's now "value over volume"

U.S. oil production returned to record levels in October, exceeding pre-COVID numbers. As oil prices are finishing their second year averaging more than $80 a barrel, it may be surprising it took producers this long to get back up to speed. However, this is a trend in oil production globally, a strategy sometimes referred to as “value over volume” as it emphasizes shareholder returns rather than production growth, which had been the goal for the prior two decades.

U.S. government shutdown averted as deadlines moved into early 2024

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson shepherded a “clean” continuing resolution bill through the House to fund the U.S. government into next year, beating the November deadline and, thus far, avoiding the blowback that had cost his predecessor his position. January 19, 2024 is the new deadline to pass four of 12 spending bills, and February 2 is the deadline for the remaining eight. Near-term attention will be focused on the National Defense Authorization Act, a “must-pass” defense funding bill that could intersect with the market on potential technology and trade restrictions. 

Equity rally more than AI

With some notable sector exceptions, the past three months was a story of seven exceptionally performing large-cap technology stocks and everybody else. November’s rally, however, came for nearly everyone, as the S&P 500 soared 8.92% and small-cap stocks followed with an 8.83% gain for the Russell 2000. Smaller companies particularly benefited from lower yields, being particularly susceptible to the cost of borrowing.

Fixed income sentiment relaxes

Fixed income markets entered November in a volatile state, but by the end of the month the general investor attitude shifted to taking comfort in the idea that the Fed has put a lid on its tightening program. This saw intermediate- to long-range yields lower by roughly 50 basis points compared to October. Investment-grade A and BBB corporate spreads and high-yield spreads narrowed to a yearly low, and municipal yields as a percentage of Treasury yields also narrowed significantly.  

The bottom line

While November’s gains were a welcome sight after three months of steady declines, rising stocks and falling bond yields contribute to the inflationary heat the Fed has worked to cool. This means that while the Fed seemingly called off a final interest rate hike for the year, one could expect a response if inflation turns around. As long as that threat looms, the markets will likely remain volatile.

Investing involves risk, and investors may incur a profit or a loss. All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the authors and are subject to change. There is no assurance the trends mentioned will continue or that the forecasts discussed will be realized. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Economic and market conditions are subject to change. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is an unmanaged index of 30 widely held stocks. The NASDAQ Composite Index is an unmanaged index of all common stocks listed on the NASDAQ National Stock Market. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks. The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia and Far East) index is an unmanaged index that is generally considered representative of the international stock market. The Russell 2000 is an unmanaged index of small-cap securities. The Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based flagship benchmark that measures the investment grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market. An investment cannot be made in these indexes. The performance mentioned does not include fees and charges, which would reduce an investor’s returns. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Investing in oil involves special risks, including the potential adverse effects of state and federal regulation and may not be suitable for all investors. U.S. government bonds and Treasury notes are guaranteed by the U.S. government and, if held to maturity, offer a fixed rate of return and guaranteed principal value. U.S. government bonds are issued and guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest by the federal government. Treasury notes are certificates reflecting  intermediate-term (2 -10 years) obligations of the U.S. government. Companies engaged in business related to the technology sector are subject to fierce competition and their products and services may be subject to rapid obsolescence.

Material created by Raymond James for use by its advisors.

Disinflation, Not Deflation

First Trust Monday Morning Outlook

Brian S. Wesbury - Chief Economist

Robert Stein, CFA - Dep. Chief Economist

December 4, 2023

New home prices are much lower than a year ago. The average price of a new home sold in October was 10.4% lower, while the median price was down 17.6%.

Records on new home prices go back all the way to the Kennedy Administration and never before has the median new home price dropped so much in twelve months, even during the bursting of the housing bubble in 2007-11. Is this a signal that monetary policy has become excruciatingly tight, that deflation – an outright and generalized drop in consumer prices – is about to grip the US economy?

Hardly.

In fact, deflation doesn’t even have a grip on the housing market. New home prices only include the prices for the new homes sold each month, which in the past year has averaged about 55,000 per month. That’s out of a total housing stock of about 145 million homes. In other words, new home prices reflect what’s going on each month with only about 0.04% of all homes.

Another big problem with just looking at prices for new homes sold is that those sold in October 2023 might be very different in size and quality than the new homes sold a year ago. Mortgage rates are higher, so many new home buyers are cropping their appetites, buying smaller homes to reduce their projected future mortgage payments. And builders are reacting to this, building smaller, less expensive homes. As a result, the average and median prices are falling, but not the price per square foot.

Better gauges of national home prices include the Case-Shiller index and the FHFA index, which are designed to adjust for the quality of homes. They also attempt to track the sales price of the same homes over time. These two indexes show home prices up 3.9% and 6.0% in the past year, respectively. In other words, no deflation. Home prices are not really falling.

And, when politics gets involved with economic data, confusion is often the result. When you hear that “inflation is falling” what that means is that prices are still rising, just not as fast as they were a year ago. The PCE price index, the Fed’s favorite measure for inflation, is up 3.0% in the past year versus a gain of 6.3% in the year ending in October 2022. Core PCE prices, which exclude food and energy, are up 3.5% in the past year versus a gain of 5.3% in the year ending in October 2022.

We expect this process to continue, with consumer prices climbing, but at a slower pace. Yes, they might fall in a particular month when energy prices drop, but even in those months core prices will continue to rise.

It’s important to remember that although the M2 measure of the money supply is down 4.5% from the peak in July 2022, that follows the surge of 40% that preceded it. That huge increase is still wending its way into the economy, and it would be crazy to try to take all that money back out. That would cause a massive deflationary problem. As a result, the general price level is permanently higher than the path it was on pre-COVID.

The bottom line is that the stance of monetary policy is tight enough to keep bringing inflation down in 2024. But don’t expect it to stay there so long that general prices start consistently falling. At present, the futures market is pricing in a drop in short-term interest rates of about 1.25 percentage points. We think the rate cuts will be steeper, the front edge of a shift in policy that will eventually cause an echo of the 2021-23 inflation problem in the years ahead. Unfortunately, like the 1970s.

The attached information was developed by First Trust, an independent third party. The opinions are of the listed authors at First Trust Advisors L.P, and are independent from and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James.  All investments are subject to risk. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions, or forecasts provided in the attached article will prove to be correct. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Forward looking data is subject to change at any time and there is no assurance that projections will be realized. Any information provided is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected.

Argentina: Is the Pendulum Swinging, Again?

First Trust Monday Morning Outlook

Brian S. Wesbury - Chief Economist

Robert Stein, CFA - Dep. Chief Economist

November 27, 2023

When Argentina entered the 20th Century, its prospects looked bright. On a per person basis, its economy was on par with Canada and Sweden and about two-thirds of the United States.

This all changed in 1946 when the country elected Juan Peron to the presidency. Peron launched plans to foster social justice through economic redistribution. The government sector grew rapidly (spending and money printing) and very high inflation (300%+) became the norm. Standards of living plummeted.

Without a change in policies, inflation could not be eradicated. Then, in the 1990s, Argentina tried a currency board arrangement where each Argentine peso was backed by one American dollar. Like the old-fashioned gold standard before the creation of the Federal Reserve, each unit of Argentine currency was backed by something that held its value. That currency board system worked for about a decade, bringing inflation down to US levels and spurring a decade of solid economic growth.

However, it broke down in 2001-02, largely because government spending never really subsided. When the government couldn’t print new money, it borrowed. Investors (correctly) thought politicians would abandon the currency board and let the value of the peso fall at the first sign of economic trouble. And that’s exactly what happened.

Now Argentina finds itself with another lost decade of growth and hyper-inflation. Recently, Argentina’s per person GDP stood less than 20% of US levels, and below even Russia.

But last month brought a political earthquake: the presidential election was won in a landslide by Javier Milei, a libertarian economist, and an unbridled and outspoken critic of socialism and supporter of free-market capitalism.

Milei wants to end the Argentine peso and central bank completely and just use the US dollar as the country’s currency. That way, re-introducing the peso would be very hard, so Argentines could be confident the government wouldn’t devalue again. He wants to slash government spending, including spending on the social safety net and get rid of lots of government agencies.

Unfortunately, he has his work cut out for him. Although he’s popular with voters he doesn’t come from a political party with widespread support in the legislative branch. As a result, it remains to be seen how much Milei can accomplish.

And yet this isn’t the only big shift at the polls in recent months, with voters in New Zealand and the Netherlands swinging toward leaders seeking some major changes.

The long historic battle between those who support wealth creation and those who support wealth redistribution, continues. The pendulum is starting to swing. We think much of this recent pattern is due to voters getting fed up with governments that are too big. Even the election of Geert Wilders in the Netherlands, ostensibly about immigration has a big government component, due to taxpayer-funded resources that, right or wrong, voters think recent immigrants’ demand.

When governments are already very large, and inflation rises while growth suffers, it’s harder for the left to make bigger government appealing to voters, and easier for the right to make trimming government look attractive.

The pendulum is swinging toward smaller government. If leaders fulfill this desire, investors around the globe will have reason to cheer. While Argentina has followed a different rhythm than many Western countries, the elections of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan changed the direction of global economic growth. Is it happening again?

The attached information was developed by First Trust, an independent third party. The opinions are of the listed authors at First Trust Advisors L.P, and are independent from and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James.  All investments are subject to risk. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions, or forecasts provided in the attached article will prove to be correct. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Forward looking data is subject to change at any time and there is no assurance that projections will be realized. Any information provided is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected.